|
The
log is a graph of resistance and depth. The vertical axis
shows depth in centimeters and the horizontal axis shows resistance
in thousands of ohms.
The log begins at a depth of 2 cm because at 1 cm the resistance
was too high to measure on our ohmmeter. The maximum value
it can read is 2,000,000 ohms.

What does our log show? It appears that the resistance is
generally higher near the surface. Although the resistance
does not always drop from one level to the next, all the readings
from 5 cm down show a lower resistance than any of the readings
from 4 cm up. What accounts for the difference? We know from
the Electrical Resistivity of
Materials experiment that dry soil has a high resistance
while wet soil tends to have a lower resistance. This is because
water with some impurities conducts electricity while most
dry soil does not conduct electricity well. It seems likely
that the soil is wetter several centimeters below the surface
than higher up. When the plant is watered the water flows
down and wets the soil throughout the pot. Then it starts
to evaporate from the top first. So it is likely that the
deeper soil is holding more water. There are other possible
factors that could produce this result. There might be a different
soil composition at different levels, but this isn't likely
since all the potting soil all came from the same bag and
was relatively uniform.
There might be a higher salt content in the deeper soil.
We know that salt water is a better conductor of electricity
that fresh water. But this explanation is weak because potting
soil is not salty and we never added salt to the soil. Maybe
theres some oil mixed into the soil near the surface.
Oil does not conduct electricity. This is also an unlikely
explanation because theres no reason to believe that
oil was introduced into the soil and the soil near the surface
does not feel oily.
Our original explanation, that the soil near the surface
is drier, is most likely correct.
Were thinking about building a better logging tool.
This one has some defects and limitations that we think can
be corrected with a better design.
The tool is not very sturdy. It works well for soft soil,
but a pencil point is not a very good drilling tool, and the
pencil itself could break if more pressure were applied to
it.
In the oilfield there is another another approach called
"wireline logging" in which the logging tool doesn't
do the drilling. Instead, its attached to a cable and
then lowered into a hole thats already been drilled.
The pencil tool models "logging while drilling"
where the logging tool is integrated into the drill pipe.
Maybe well design and build a wireline logging tool
next time.
Another problem with our tool is that the wiring is not well
protected. With the wires running along the outside of the
tool the plastic insulation is subject to wear.
The tool is not sufficiently waterproof. After just one use
the electrical tape started to unravel. We think this is because
of dampness in the soil.
Well work on it. Maybe you can come up with a better
design also. If you do, share it with us by sending a description,
pictures and a log.
|